The data in evaluations.csv come from Hamermesh & Parker (2005) and were made available by Gelman & Hill (2007). This data were collected from student evaluations of instructors’ beauty and teaching quality for several courses at the University of Texas. The teaching evaluations were conducted at the end of the semester, and the beauty judgments were made later, by six students who had not attended the classes and were not aware of the course evaluations. The variables are:
prof_id: Professor ID number
avg_eval: Average course rating
num_courses: Number of courses for which the professor has evaluations
num_students: Number of students enrolled in the professor’s courses
perc_evaluating: Average percentage of enrolled students who completed an evaluation
beauty: Measure of the professor’s beauty composed of the average score on six standardized beauty ratings
tenured: Is the professor tenured? (0 = non-tenured; 1 = tenured)
native_english: Is the professor a native English speaker? (0 = non-native English speaker; 1 = native English speaker)
age: Professor’s age (in years)
female: Is the professor female? (0 = not female; 1 = female)
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hamermesh, D. S., & Parker, A. M. (2005). Beauty in the classroom: Instructors’ pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity. Economics of Education Review, 24, 369–376.